Previous Entry | Next Entry

Dollhouse

  • Feb. 15th, 2009 at 11:52 PM
superfail
I watched "Dollhouse" tonight, and I enjoyed it but with some major reservations.

The scene between the tech and Echo's handler was a clunky, painful example of "As You Know, Bob" exposition that was pretty much insulting in this day and age when even a cop show like "Life" (which, to be fair, I think is pretty damn good tv) showed better pacing and subtlety in the revelation of its basic premise. Speaking of which, what I have are issues with the fundamental premise of the show -- not the squicky human trafficking one most people bring up (I take it as read that Joss is going somewhere with this; he's certainly not endorsing it, so getting all upset that it's even happening in the story seems silly. Drama has to come from somewhere, usually from conflict.)

No the problem I have is with the actual set-up of the show. The "Actives" are being imprinted and reimprinted with all these different personalities and sent out into the world. They are expensive, so only people with LOTS of money and/or power could hope to hire these people.

I see major logistical problems. The entirety of what Echo does in the first episode happens within a single city and its environs (or at least they make no effort to give us the sense that it doesn't). Echo is seen in company with a client at a very busy restaurant/bar location filled with lots of people who apparently have the wherewithal to hang out with her wealthy client-employer.

So.... how is this going to work? Fairly soon, the Venn diagram of people who both know of and can afford to hire Actives is going to start overlapping with the people who have encountered her in their rarified circles. This is a problem similar to that faced by Sydney on Alias but at least she wore crazy disguises for every mission.

No, this is not a convincing world. This is not a convincing set-up. I also didn't like the by-the-numbers casting. Meek Amy Acker playing scarred-up meek Doctor Woman was meek; smart-alecky overconfident cute tech-boy was smart-alecky and overconfident; dominatrix woman-in-charge was ice-queenish; good-guy ex-cop was conflicted and good; handsome, bucking-the-system cop was called on the carpet for bucking the system and then immediately further ignored orders and broke the rules to do his job, etc.

I would at *least* have swapped Amy Acker to play the tech. It wasn't so much that the roles were a bit standard-issue (though it was a bit of that); it's that the actors playing them fit the stereotypes so exactly. I do hope that is something that is going to be subverted in the near future but since the focus is on the Actives, I do wonder...

Still, I'll keep watching for a bit to see things build up. A show like this is about layering; it entertained and intrigued enough to get a few more episode-watchings out of me.

And now, to Bedfordshire!

Tags:

Comments

( 5 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]deathquaker wrote:
Feb. 16th, 2009 01:16 pm (UTC)
I didn't get the sense that the Actives only work in that one city. But you're absolutely right, if they do, it does cause potential for a problem. They might even address that... I kinda have a feeling that the guy looking for Echo at the end of the episode is going to see her face captured while she's on one of her "engagements." OTOH, I noticed stuff in the first episode like, while she's riding around in the city on the motorcycle, she has a mirrored helmet on (doesn't protect her at the party, but outside where there might be police cameras it does). When she's "Eleanor Penn" she looks a) very different, and b) when outside stays inside a dark car most of the time--that I recall. That could be put to the test on a rewatch.

As for Amy Acker, she is known for showing surprising levels of badassery (see "Alias," see "Justice League" (voice of Helena Bertinelli), see "Angel," and I don't just mean Illyria, I mean Fred attacking her friends, who magically turned against her, with a fire extinguisher and a handful of nails) so if she's being typecast, which she might well be, I have a feeling Dr. Saunders is going to do an about face at some point when she gets fed up with what's going on.

I thought the rest of the cast seemed cast well (not that I'm familiar with the rest of the actors) and didn't have a problem with their characterization. Seemed fitting for the kind of story being told, IMHO, of course.
[info]jennawaterford wrote:
Feb. 17th, 2009 02:44 am (UTC)
I know this is the pilot he produced on demand, and I'm guessing this is where most of the story weaknesses spring from -- he was trying to please the suits. Still, there is a certain finesse lacking which unfortunately seems related to the show setup and not just the pilot. Alias (which, along with Angel, had the Best Pilot Ever, IMO) did a great job of communicating scope in a very short-hand way, and for a show like this, I'd expect a similar scope simply due to what's going on with the Dollhouse.

Echo is wearing a helmet which she removes and leaves behind *after she dumps the bike* (this was my first WTF moment in the show. She dumps the helmet right after she proves she needs it?) and drives on without it. She's clearly in the same city as the HQ because she starts her musing on her new boyfriend in the van and is still finishing it up when she's wiped which implies a very short time period (or that this personality was a complete chatterbox and a ditz -- unlikely).

The next situation involves the client coming to their offices so he must be local. You want to keep a top secret thing top secret? How about not having the clients know where the HQ is? How about not having the admin offices in the same building as the Actives? What could go wrong?! This was a Dumb Angel Thing they did with W&H (of which the set is far too reminiscent, but that's a nitpick).

These things read as sloppy to me, and it's worrisome. All three of his other shows had rock-solid, well-thought-out set-ups. Especially on shows like this (spy-type shows), you have to look for the really obvious holes and plug them because you're asking for a lot of suspension of disbelief.

I still think it has potential, and I look forward to seeing the actual pilot, but these are my concerns.
[info]deathquaker wrote:
Feb. 17th, 2009 12:59 pm (UTC)
Yes, I've seen that objection about the motorcycle scene (I honestly overlooked it the first time, as I was totally just reading it as a melodramatic character reveal and not thinking about its place in the setting as a whole).

The client coming to the Dollhouse--he was a very wealthy man. It's not clear how far he traveled to get there. I imagine the kind of wealthy clientele they have, people are willing to hop a plane to make a transaction. Business men jump planes to single two hour meetings all the freaking time; doing it one more time isn't going to make a difference.

You're right, they do need to explain the logistics of how that place works a lot better, but fortunately, we have plenty of time to see what they do with what they've got. Being a character oriented-gal myself, I admit paying more attention to how the people were set up than the setting itself. Which could have been the focus of the writing as well, which is why the setting ends up lacking a bit.



[info]kaiserthegreat wrote:
Feb. 20th, 2009 09:45 pm (UTC)
It didn't have the same spark as his other shows, for sure, and the premise was straining my suspended disbelief a bit, and I hadn't even thought about your "same city" point, so thanks for that. ;) But I'll probably keep trying it, because episode 1 of Buffy or Angel wasn't as good as episode 54 of Buffy or Angel.
[info]jennawaterford wrote:
Feb. 27th, 2009 06:40 pm (UTC)
I'm certainly going to give it a big chance; I liked the 2nd episode more (though it still had the same locational dissonance issues).

Point of order: I've always considered the Angel pilot one of the best pilots I've ever seen.
( 5 comments — Leave a comment )

Latest Month

December 2009
S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Page Summary

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lilia Ahner